Tag Archives: salmonfarming

All about krill

Amidst the feed ingredients that are emerging as viable protein sources in the face of growing global food demands, krill stands out as a particularly promising one for future salmon production. But what makes it so appealing, and how is it being integrated into salmon diets?

At the North Atlantic Seafood Forum in Bergen last month, I listened to a presentation by Sigve Nordrum, CCO of Aker QRILL Company, an Antarctic krill-harvesting company that develops krill-based ingredients. During his talk, Nordrum introduced some of the most important health issues in farmed salmon in Norway, including delousing injuries, gill disease, wounds and vinter ulcers, before highlighting the ability of Antarctic krill (Euphausia superba) to provide salmon with a package of nutrients, attractants and proteins, such as peptides, astaxanthin, choline, phospholipids and omega-3s. He also introduced some studies, conducted by Aker QRILL Company, which show that krill meal can help to reduce sea lice (25% reduction in sea lice compared to a control diet), heal wounds (55% reduced scarring and better gross appearance of wounds compared to a control diet), reduce melanin spots (0% melanin spots in salmon given krill meal compared to 13% in salmon on a control diet), and offer better growth and reduced mortality. 

These advantages, the feed attractant properties of krill, which enhance feed intake and growth performance, and the transfer of astaxanthin to salmon fillets, improving pigmentation and overall fillet quality, really stood out to me during the presentation. It was clear why one of the most abundant animal species on the planet is a front-runner as a possible fishmeal and fish oil alternative. 

Krill is usually integrated into salmon diets during the final production stage before harvesting. It is integrated primarily through feed that is made from dried and ground krill, and krill oil. It is added as a supplement in small amounts, no more than 10%, in order to provide an array of benefits. Because it cannot be taken as a regular protein source or as a complete fishmeal or fish oil replacement, it is considered a feed additive and must be used strategically, taking all key nutrients into account, in order to make it cost-effective. According to a 2022 research paper, just 8 – 10% of krill meal for 10 to 12 weeks is considered sufficient to achieve growth performance benefits.

Before delving into the potential of krill in salmon farming, I did a bit of reading to find out more about the positive attributes of these small, shrimp-like creatures, and learned about their importance to the health of the ocean and the atmosphere. Interestingly, they can increase the store of carbon in the deep ocean by releasing essential nutrients such as ammonium and iron into the water (these nutrients are excreted as waste products through faeces.) Tiny plants at the base of the marine food web, like phytoplankton, can then use these nutrients to photosynthesise and grow. Krill can increase the store of carbon in the deep ocean because their faeces, in pellet form, sinks quickly and remains on the sea bed for years. One study shows that young krill that live near sea ice may be particularly important in the carbon sink because they live deeper in the water column compared to adult krill. This means that any faecal pellets released by younger krill could escape any currents that may return them to the surface, and instead sink further until they reach the deep.

Meanwhile, aquaculture has long been searching for different protein sources to reduce its dependence on marine resources. It is also becoming clear that aquaculture cannot rely on just a few sources of raw materials, especially scarce and limited marine resources. Aquaculture is now at a point where searching for new ingredients for the formulation of feed has become one of its key focal points. Over the years, krill meal has been vastly studied, and its benefits, such as improved feed intake, growth performance, fillet quality and fish health, have been well documented. 

The array of benefits that krill provides has contributed to increased demand for krill fishing from sectors such as pharmaceuticals, as well as aquaculture. These benefits have changed the nature of the krill fishery by showing that it’s possible to obtain more valuable products from krill than was initially thought, according to Dr. George Watters of the Antarctic Ecosystem Research Division at NOAA. In addition, logistical, sustainable and harvesting concerns remain over how much krill is fished and from where. Catching and processing krill can also be expensive, while concerns are high that krill fishing could decrease the species’ carbon sink capacity and create competition for natural predators of krill. The Commission for the Conservation of Antarctic Marine Living Resources (CCAMLR), which manages the Antarctic krill fishery, has acted by regulating the total krill catch within a 620,000 tonne ‘trigger’ level across four regions in the southwest Atlantic, and establishing an overall catch limit of 5.6 million metric tonnes a year to prevent krill fleets from concentrating their fishing activities in small areas. Hopes are high that this could regulate fishing, ensure that krill’s natural predators have access to food, and protect krill stocks in a fragile ecosystem while making sure that the resource is healthy and sustainable. 

Aquaculture has acknowledged the issues that come with harvesting krill. While committing to keeping its krill fishery operations away from penguin colonies in the Antarctic Peninsula during breeding season, Aker QRILL Company has offered support for the Antarctic Wildlife Research Fund (AWRF) to promote Antarctic marine ecosystem research, including projects that focus on fishery management for Antarctic krill. Aker QRILL Company has also received an A rating from the Sustainable Fisheries Partnership for having a krill fishery in very good condition.

With more awareness towards the concerns, and at a time when the ocean is already under pressure from threats like climate change, krill fisheries and the use of krill, not only in aquaculture but also in other sectors, is drawing attention. Because these sectors benefit from krill, hopefully they will make positive contributions in return, for example supporting krill ecosystem-based management systems and working to ensure that fisheries do not have any negative ecological impacts. My hope is that they can work methodically and sustainably to ensure that resources like krill are being used responsibly.

A Look Back at Bergen: North Atlantic Seafood Forum 2025

Earlier this month, over 1,000 people gathered for the annual North Atlantic Seafood Forum in Bergen, Norway. With participants from 32 countries, five continents, and nearly 400 organisations, the conference involved three days of discussions, networking and industry insights. Key issues in salmon farming were discussed as part of a packed programme that also included a networking evening reception. 

I had a great time catching up with familiar faces, making new connections and enjoying the presentations. Bringing together leading experts and important policymakers, the conference highlighted vital developments shaping the future of salmon farming and provided insights on a range of subjects from technology and AI to feed ingredients, markets and challenges. It was an opportunity to gain a valuable perspective on innovation and commercial development in the salmon sector, and increase understanding of the financial and economic issues affecting markets today. 


Cage Talk 
The first day of the conference looked at addressing the challenges of farming salmon at sea through technology, best practices and innovation. The Cage Talk session first discussed the importance of rearing smolt on land for longer to reduce the amount of time the fish spend at sea. This has an array of advantages, according to Oyvind Oaland, chief of farming operations at seafood firm Mowi in Norway and Iceland. He explained that as a result, sea lice treatments can be reduced and site capacity and survival can increase. During a presentation from salmon farming company Cermaq, Harald Tackle introduced the company’s use of 50m-deep skirts in Tofino, Canada, to address sea lice, and the use of laser technology on salmon farms in Norway to control sea lice and reduce the need for treatment. 

During this session, and indeed throughout the entire conference, the word collaboration featured prominently. The salmon sector needs to work closely with authorities to establish further regulations towards sustainable growth, and work with academia and researchers to develop science-based, objective knowledge and information to address key challenges. Skilled engineers are also important to drive ocean innovation systems that can support growth. The salmon sector has many stakeholders with their own expertise who can contribute across the value chain, streamlining operations, reducing environmental impact or ensuring good living conditions for fish. Collaboration between stakeholders can drive these positive steps, allowing the industry to grow and improving other areas, including consumers’ access to sustainable seafood options.

Focus on Feed
Feed was once again on the menu this year, with a strong focus on the role of feed ingredients in environmental impacts assessment and mitigation, life cycle assessment and nutritional balance to ensure fish health and growth. There is already plenty of proof and innovation in salmon farming showing that alternative feed ingredients like algae, insects and single cell proteins are reliable and viable. In fact, the conference made it clear that these ingredients are already playing a part in de-risking the supply of essential nutrients for feed, while the salmon sector’s commitment to incorporating such ingredients is strong. During the presentations, Skretting introduced a matrix for novel ingredients, while Biomar Norway shared its data from 2024 on inclusion rates of microalgae (2.4%) and other ingredients such as insects (2.18%).

It was also noted that the focus on alternative feed ingredients is not about replacing marine ingredients, but rather adding to them. However, it is up to the entire value chain to generate real impact, and create reliable markets for alternative feed ingredients to ensure that they can scale. During the feed sessions, some examples of steady leadership were highlighted, such as Cermaq’s commitment to sustainable feed, while Marco Custodio, project manager at consultancy Earthworm Foundation, touched upon the need to understand consumer attitudes towards alternative ingredients before market creation and scale up. He described consumer surveys that have been carried out in France, highlighting the need to conduct such studies to align with market expectations and improve transparency and communication with consumers.

Another main point raised during the feed sessions is that supply must expand. Algae innovators have already added 10% to global EPA and DHA supply, but not just for aquaculture. Meanwhile, the availability of insect meal is growing, but slowly. Can the examples presented at the conference continue to develop, and work to build a more sustainable future for feed?

Salmon Welfare
I always enjoy discussions on animal welfare in aquaculture, so it was great to see an entire session devoted to this topic. Salmon Welfare in Aquaculture showed that with Norwegian seafood exports reaching record levels in 2024, ensuring fish health is essential to maintaining consumer trust, regulatory confidence, and operational efficiency. The morning consisted of two panels talking about industry risk and sustainable growth through change management. They provided solutions-oriented discussions, while exploring the challenges and opportunities of fish welfare from various perspectives. Once again, the key message was collaboration, and the need to work together to shape the future of ethical, sustainable salmon farming.

It was also interesting to hear whether fish health and welfare might have been sacrificed on the road to long-term success. Edgar Brun, academic director of Fish Health and Welfare Institute, asked this question and gave quite a strong assessment on the state of salmon health today, calling out poor crisis management and a reluctance to engage with critics.

But at the same time, the salmon farming sector clearly understands that despite the many challenges, good welfare is the only option, that this is at the heart of the trust equation and that the sector must demonstrate evidence of tangible improvements to maintain its social licence to operate. Examples of how salmon farms could take a step forward included improving understanding of welfare and what to look out for when it comes to good and bad welfare, being prepared for possible changes, and making a commitment to adapt. A nice touch during the session was a presentation by Hilde Talseth, CEO of leading broiler chicken producer Norsk Kylling. She explained what her company has done to improve the welfare of its chickens and create better rearing environments, and said that farmers, who interact daily with animals, are the true experts in identifying health and welfare issues firsthand, so building trust with them is extremely important. She also touched upon the theme of collaboration and the need to foster this to drive meaningful progress.

This year’s conference came with many more presentations and interactive discussions that covered more than what I’ve described, but they all focused on a single message – the importance of a collaborative approach to promote growth in a sustainable manner and within planetary boundaries. I also believe that the full potential of salmon farming, or indeed aquaculture as a whole, can be realised with greater collaboration between industry, regulators, academia, researchers, businesses, producers, consumers and more. A common understanding and vision will make it possible to promote a vibrant and attractive sector going forward.

*Next year’s North Atlantic Seafood Forum will take place in Bergen, Norway, from the 3rd to 5th March 2026.